Tag: politics

Higher Ed: Your Students are Being Abducted and We All Need to Hear From You!

murrayof

I’ve spent a lot of time in schools -between attending plenty of school, working in schools K-12, and teaching graduate students. Also, I have a lot of friends and social media connections in education and higher education. Like many professionals, especially those working directly with patients in therapy, I’ve mostly kept my politics out of my professional public presence. 

My game changer was Rumeysa Ozturk being swept off the sidewalk by government thugs. For me, it marked the difference between living under a wanna-be authoritarian regime and an actual authoritarian regime. People are being disappeared. (Here’s a United States Disappeared Tracker, made by data and public policy expert Danielle Harlow.) While there is no fine-line distinction between government and politics, I feel my concerns are more governmental than political. Some of the government’s main authoritarian efforts are directly impacting my professional community. Not talking about it doesn’t seem like an option to me.

As I look at professional conversations online, especially toward empowered individuals in higher education, I don’t see much talk about the government’s authoritarian efforts. This is disheartening. I must be looking toward academic elites for the same reason the Trump administration seeks to compromise them – because they have status and power in our culture. Their choices set an example for other institutions, organizations, and individuals. 

To the lack of vigorous protest from academic elites: On one hand, I’m happy to see that we are not all abandoning our posts, so to speak. Academics are still posting about their areas of specialty. This is one element of a healthy response. We have to keep doing the things we do well –  we have to maintain them. It keeps us grounded. Our knowledge and skill are the nuts and bolts that hold the structure and purpose of academia together. Otherwise, we are prone to becoming just another gust of wind in a chaotic storm, just another reaction for someone else to react to.

We also need to speak up loud and clear for fundamental, constitutional rights, and in defense of academic employees, especially students! 

It is going to be a tough four years. Take a moment to accept that. Let it sink in. Yes, it’s awful. But it’s also finite. And as Trump increasingly talks seriously about a third term, keeping it to four rough years depends on us standing up together.

On top of students being abducted, professors are losing their jobs. More will lose their jobs. We will have to take care of each other, and find our way through it. The alternative is complicity in undermining and degrading our institutions, our students, this nation, and ourselves. 

The Trump administration’s playbook is to invite you down the road of degradation with the most inviting baby-steps, which they will try to frame as reasonable. But once you start down that path, it becomes increasingly difficult to turn around. 

The degrading challenge sounds like this to me: 

I hear you value democracy, free thinking, internationalism, diversity, equity, inclusion, and the free exchange of ideas? How nice. People think we are so different! But I know better, we have so much in common. The important stuff. You and I… we have status and wealth. That’s the real team we are on. -The rich, the important, the successful. And, with the power of the US government, when I force you to choose between your democratic principles or staying with our team, on the side of status and wealth – I know you, and I know what you will choose. 

And the degradation begins.

I support anyone who wants to speak up and act up in support of any of our brothers and sisters who have been abducted, assaulted, and disappeared. For me, it makes sense to respond locally. I am speaking up for Rumeysa Ozturk, the Tufts University child study and human development doctoral student abducted by government thugs for contributing to a thoughtful opinion piece published in the university newspaper.

Furthermore, speaking of degradation, the Trump administration is using the genocide of Palestinians to degrade all Americans. That is part of the reason they are choosing this wedge issue to attack University campuses. -To stoke division, confusion, and distress. If we won’t speak up clearly against the murder, displacement, and starvation of Palestinians – the death toll now greater than 50,000 – they will know they have degraded us sufficiently to not speak up for anyone.

“End DEI” – What Part of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Do You Have a Problem With?

murrayof

The Trump administration unveiled its “End DEI” portal about a week ago. 

I encourage you – teachers, school counselors, and administrators – do not let this obvious scare tactic shake your resolve to stand by your values

The portal asks for reporting of “illegal discriminatory practices”, and then references several long-standing civil rights statutes in fine print. Nothing has changed about what is illegal and what is not illegal. The Trump administration is throwing around the word “illegal” to frighten people, but the administration does not make the law, and the relevant laws have not changed. The administration is counting on educators and administrators being frightened, not reading the fine print, and not thinking critically. So, this is where we can defy their low expectations for us. Reach out to like-minded people for support, and lend heart to your wavering colleagues.

These issues will work their way through the courts over time. I don’t know what directions those cases will go, but I do know that is a process that takes time. In the meantime, carry on and stand up for your values. For me, those include truth, connection, engagement, and freedom of speech and expression.

And what is the point of “end DEI”? What part of diversity, equity, and inclusion does the Trump administration have a problem with? They might say that they have no problem with diversity per se and that they support equity, and that they support some types of inclusion. They would say they take issue with the conversations and approaches popular within the DEI movement. 

But the administration’s remedy is not engaging in the conversation, it is to “end DEI”. They would like us to just not talk about diversity, equity, and inclusion. They want us to be afraid of talking about these issues. But there is no way to avoid issues of diversity and equity in our diverse nation, which is struggling under the weight of historically large income inequality. And there is no way to avoid the topic of inclusion within public institutions meant to serve a public of diverse abilities and resources. 

Because these issues are inescapable, avoiding them is just another means of grappling with diversity, equity, and inclusion. But, instead of engaging in dialogue, they seek to ban speech and frighten educators. We who choose to stand by our values and talk about the issues we confront daily in American life: the law is on our side, and the Bill of Rights is on our side. Basic reason is on our side  -that as a nation we grow and develop through dialogue, not through bullying and banning and trying to frighten people. 

So, I encourage you to take courage, while we wait and see how the courts process the administration’s bizarre proclamations and actions. But, it’s important that you stand up for your values while we wait, otherwise, it doesn’t matter what the courts rule, the Trump administration will have already won.

On the Recent Executive Order Regarding Education

murrayof

I have read the January 29th, 2025 executive order titled “Ending Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling.”

It prints out at 10 pages. The image that comes to mind when I recall reading it is a firehose of mud. It is a mess that provides something for people supportive of the president’s agenda to work with, and therefore advances their cause. 

When people stand up to it in the courts, some judges might be sympathetic to the president’s assertions. 

Many judges will not be. 

It’s hot garbage. But that doesn’t mean it is unimportant or ineffective in advancing the admistration’s goals. It gives their odious ideas some foothold within the government. And even more significantly, it frightens a group of people who generally trend toward a rule-bound relationship with authority: teachers and administrators.

The executive order is filled with vague concepts. Here’s a snippet: “‘Patriotic education’ means a presentation of the history of America grounded in: an accurate, honest, unifying, inspiring, and ennobling characterization of America’s founding and foundational principles.” Most people capable of a little bit of thought would concede that there are aspects of the history of the U.S. and its founding that reflect these positive qualities, and aspects that most certainly do not. And therefore, there is no way to be accurate and honest without including the less ennobling parts of the United States’ history and founding. 

Furthermore, at what point could anyone determine with clarity that an educational approach is not sufficiently “grounded” in accuracy, honesty, unification, inspiration, and ennobling characterization, all at the same time? It would be nearly impossible to make such a determination. 

And this is but a snippet. When you analyze the text, it starts to make zero sense very quickly. 

The president’s power to declare these rules is very unclear. The proclamations are largely impossible to understand or implement. And, they likely run afoul of teachers’ and students’ First Amendment protections.

Adding yet another layer to the nonsense, the president’s administration is trying to simultaneously increase and decrease federal control of education. -One one hand insisting on these proclamations, on the other hand seeking to dismantle the very federal agency that exerts influence on education in the U.S.

I am firmly in the “do not comply in advance” camp, as recommended by Timothy Snyder in On Tyranny (2017).

This can be hard for some teachers, who run classrooms where rules and authority play a central role. What I say to teachers and administrators is: The president is not your supervisor. There may come a time when your actual supervisor gives you instructions that you don’t want to follow. At that point you will need to decide whether you will comply. That might be very difficult. You will confront that moment if it arrives. But again, I ask you not to comply with your anticipated ideas about what will be asked of you, in advance of that moment.

Anxiety is anticipation, and our power to anticipate is one of our great strengths as humans. But we start to lock ourselves in a miserable position when we behave as if events we anticipate with anxiety are already occurring. We must not do this to ourselves or our schools. And, if we are opposed to this attempt to limit the freedom and efficacy of teachers, we must not cede ground so easily.

References

Snyder, T. (2017). On tyranny: Twenty lessons from the twentieth century. Crown